
There is no action on this issue at this time. Material provided for
reference only.

Issue History
On February 15, 2000, the Mono County Board of Supervisors approved a
resolution calling for legislative action "to move the boundary of
the relicted lands from 6417 feet to 6392 feet, which is the management
level of Mono Lake implemented by the State Water Resources Control
Board..." This action, if implemented, would threaten the Mono Lake Tufa State Reserve
(see links for more information). Subsequent public outcry
against this poorly conceived resolution prompted the Board to reconsider
its action. In March, the Board issued a letter that explains the Board’s
support for the Mono Lake Tufa State Reserve.
After more than a year on the books, the
Mono County Board of Supervisors took action in May 2001 to rescind resolution
R00-12. In a 4-1 vote, the
Board eliminated the former resolution that contained language clearly,
though perhaps inadvertently, calling for the elimination of the land base
of the Mono Lake Tufa State Reserve (MLTSR) – a key piece of the
environmental protection puzzle at Mono Lake.
Public concern over the impacts of R00-12 and over 2300 letters
from members of the Mono Lake Committee raised awareness in the community
of the unintended consequences of the resolution.
We applaud the Board for taking such decisive action to support an
integral component of environmental protection at Mono Lake!
(243K)
Click
here to read the Board's March 21st letter
(197K)
Click here to read Board's resolution 98-47
(45K)
This resolution was passed in 1998 with the same desire to motivate state
officials to negotiate uses of relicted land with local landowners.
Our Perspective
The Mono County Board of Supervisors approved
a resolution directed to our legislators that, if implemented, would
eliminate the land base of
the Mono Lake Tufa State Reserve and therefore eliminate the Reserve
itself. The dispute between
the landowners and the state is extremely
complex, but the point is this: it can be solved and is being solved by
(admittedly slow) administrative
processes.
We enthusiastically support the Mono Lake State Reserve as an
essential protector of the public trust and as a valuable partner in
managing visitation at Mono Lake. We support the landowners' desire to use
state land when that use is not detrimental to the Reserve and when it is
also "historic use." (A key feature of the protections put in
place at Mono (the Mono Lake Tufa State Reserve and the Mono Basin National Forest
Scenic Area was recognition that historic uses should be able to
continue.) We support solving the landowners' use issue through
administrative means – that is, pressuring the state to move more
quickly to develop use leases – rather than through legislative
means.
MLC'S GOAL
(Achieved): We
want the Mono County Board of Supervisors to withdraw the resolution that
is sitting on our legislators' desks in Sacramento.


Back to Policy Page
|